# Run this cell to set up packages for lecture.
from lec26_imports import *

Lecture 26 – Residuals and Inference

DSC 10, Spring 2024

Announcements

• The Final Project is due tomorrow at 11:59PM.
  • If one or both partners has run out of slip days and you submit the project late, we will reallocate slip days towards the final project, away from lesser-weighted assignments. See the syllabus for more details.
• Lab 7 is due on Thursday at 11:59PM.
  • Even if you don't need to do this lab for your grade, it's the only assignment on regression, which will be tested on the Final Exam.
• The Final Exam is this Saturday, June 8th from 7-10PM. More details to come.
  • Collaborative study session on Friday 3/15 from 5-8PM in Solis 104.
• If at least 75% of the class fills out both SETs and the internal End-of-Quarter Survey by 8AM Saturday, then the entire class will have 1% of extra credit added to their overall grade. We value your feedback!
  • Finish the final project before taking the survey.
• Today is the last day of new material. The next two days are for review!
  • We'll be working through the Fall 2023 Final Exam on Wednesday. Read the data description and attempt the problems on your own before then!

Agenda

• Residuals.
• Inference for regression.

Residuals

Quality of fit

• The regression line describes the "best linear fit" for a given dataset.
• The formulas for the slope and intercept work no matter what the shape of the data is.
• However, the line is only meaningful if the relationship between $x$ and $y$ is roughly linear.

Example: Non-linear data

non_linear()

This line doesn't fit the data at all, despite being the "best" line for the data!

Residuals

• Any set of predictions has errors.

$$\text{error} = \text{actual } y - \text{predicted } y$$

• When using the regression line to make predictions, the errors are called residuals.

$$\text{residual} = \text{actual } y - \text{predicted } y \text{ by regression line}$$

• There is one residual corresponding to each data point $(x, y)$ in the dataset.

def predicted(df, x, y):
    m = slope(df, x, y)
    b = intercept(df, x, y)
    return m * df.get(x) + b

def residual(df, x, y):
    return df.get(y) - predicted(df, x, y)

Example: Predicting a son's height from his mother's height 👵👨 📏

Is the association between 'mom' and 'son' linear?

• If there is a linear association, is it strong?
  • We can answer this using the correlation coefficient.
  • Close to 0 = weak, close to -1/+1 = strong.

• Is "linear" the best description of the association between 'mom' and 'son'?
  • We'll use residuals to answer this question.

galton = bpd.read_csv('data/galton.csv')

male_children = galton[galton.get('gender') == 'male']
mom_son = bpd.DataFrame().assign(mom = male_children.get('mother'), 
                                 son = male_children.get('childHeight'))

mom_son_predictions = mom_son.assign(predicted=predicted(mom_son, 'mom', 'son'),
                                     residuals=residual(mom_son, 'mom', 'son'),
                                    )

plot_regression_line(mom_son_predictions, 'mom', 'son', resid=True)

Correlation: 0.3230049836849053

Residual plots

• The residual plot of a regression line is the scatter plot with the $x$ variable on the $x$-axis and residuals on the $y$-axis.

  $$\text{residual} = \text{actual } y - \text{predicted } y \text{ by regression line}$$

• Residual plots describe how the error in the regression line's predictions varies.

• Key idea: If a linear fit is good, the residual plot should look like a patternless "cloud" ☁️.

mom_son_predictions.plot(kind='scatter', x='mom', y='residuals', s=50, c='purple', figsize=(10, 5), label='residuals')
plt.axhline(0, linewidth=3, color='k', label='y = 0')
plt.title('Residual plot for predicting son\'s height based on mother\'s height')
plt.legend();

The residual plot for a non-linear association 🚗

• Consider the hybrid cars dataset from earlier.
• Let's look at a regression line that uses 'mpg' to predict 'price'.

hybrid = bpd.read_csv('data/hybrid.csv')
mpg_price = hybrid.assign(
    predicted=predicted(hybrid, 'mpg', 'price'),
    residuals=residual(hybrid, 'mpg', 'price')
)
mpg_price

	vehicle	year	price	acceleration	mpg	class	predicted	residuals
0	Prius (1st Gen)	1997	24509.74	7.46	41.26	Compact	32609.64	-8099.90
1	Tino	2000	35354.97	8.20	54.10	Compact	19278.39	16076.58
2	Prius (2nd Gen)	2000	26832.25	7.97	45.23	Compact	28487.75	-1655.50
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
150	C-Max Energi Plug-in	2013	32950.00	11.76	43.00	Midsize	30803.06	2146.94
151	Fusion Energi Plug-in	2013	38700.00	11.76	43.00	Midsize	30803.06	7896.94
152	Chevrolet Volt	2013	39145.00	11.11	37.00	Compact	37032.62	2112.38

153 rows × 8 columns

# Plot of the original data and regression line.
plot_regression_line(hybrid, 'mpg', 'price');
print('Correlation:', calculate_r(hybrid, 'mpg', 'price'))

Correlation: -0.5318263633683786

# Residual plot.
mpg_price.plot(kind='scatter', x='mpg', y='residuals', figsize=(10, 5), s=50, color='purple', label='residuals')
plt.axhline(0, linewidth=3, color='k', label='y = 0')
plt.title('Residual plot for regression between mpg and price')
plt.legend();

Note that as 'mpg' increases, the residuals go from being mostly large, to being mostly small, to being mostly large again. That's a pattern!

Issue: Patterns in the residual plot

• Patterns in the residual plot imply that the relationship between $x$ and $y$ may not be linear.
  • While this can be spotted in the original scatter plot, it may be easier to identify in the residual plot.

• In such cases, a curve may be a better choice than a line for prediction.
  • In future courses, you'll learn how to extend linear regression to work for polynomials and other types of mathematical functions.

Another example: 'mpg' and 'acceleration' ⛽

• Let's fit a regression line that predicts 'mpg' given 'acceleration'.
• Let's then look at the resulting residual plot.

accel_mpg = hybrid.assign(
    predicted=predicted(hybrid, 'acceleration', 'mpg'),
    residuals=residual(hybrid, 'acceleration', 'mpg')
)
accel_mpg

	vehicle	year	price	acceleration	mpg	class	predicted	residuals
0	Prius (1st Gen)	1997	24509.74	7.46	41.26	Compact	43.29	-2.03
1	Tino	2000	35354.97	8.20	54.10	Compact	41.90	12.20
2	Prius (2nd Gen)	2000	26832.25	7.97	45.23	Compact	42.33	2.90
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
150	C-Max Energi Plug-in	2013	32950.00	11.76	43.00	Midsize	35.17	7.83
151	Fusion Energi Plug-in	2013	38700.00	11.76	43.00	Midsize	35.17	7.83
152	Chevrolet Volt	2013	39145.00	11.11	37.00	Compact	36.40	0.60

153 rows × 8 columns

# Plot of the original data and regression line.
plot_regression_line(accel_mpg, 'acceleration', 'mpg')
print('Correlation:', calculate_r(accel_mpg, 'acceleration', 'mpg'))

Correlation: -0.5060703843771186

# Residual plot.
accel_mpg.plot(kind='scatter', x='acceleration', y='residuals', figsize=(10, 5), s=50, color='purple', label='residuals')
plt.axhline(0, linewidth=3, color='k', label='y = 0')
plt.title('Residual plot for regression between acceleration and mpg')
plt.legend();

Note that the residuals tend to vary more for smaller accelerations than they do for larger accelerations – that is, the vertical spread of the plot is not similar at all points on the $x$-axis.

Issue: Uneven vertical spread

• If the vertical spread in a residual plot is uneven, it implies that the regression line's predictions aren't equally reliable for all inputs.
  • This doesn't necessarily mean that fitting a non-linear curve would be better; it just impacts how we interpret the regression line's predictions.
  • For instance, in the previous plot, we see that the regression line's predictions for cars with larger accelerations are more reliable than those for cars with lower accelerations.

• The formal term for "uneven spread" is heteroscedasticity.

Example: Anscombe's quartet

• All 4 datasets have the same mean of $x$, mean of $y$, SD of $x$, SD of $y$, and correlation.
  • Therefore, they have the same regression line because the slope and intercept of the regression line are determined by these 5 quantities.

• But they all look very different! Not all of them contain linear associations.

Example: The Datasaurus Dozen 🦖

dino = bpd.read_csv('data/Datasaurus_data.csv')
dino

	x	y
0	55.38	97.18
1	51.54	96.03
2	46.15	94.49
...	...	...
139	50.00	95.77
140	47.95	95.00
141	44.10	92.69

142 rows × 2 columns

calculate_r(dino, 'x', 'y')

-0.06447185270095163

slope(dino, 'x', 'y')

-0.10358250243265595

intercept(dino, 'x', 'y')

53.452978449229235

plot_regression_line(dino, 'x', 'y');

Takeaway: Never trust summary statistics alone; always visualize your data!

(source)

Inference for regression

Another perspective on regression

• What we're really doing:
  • Collecting a sample of data from a population.
  • Fitting a regression line to that sample.
  • Using that regression line to make predictions for inputs that are not in our sample (e.g. for mothers whose sons we don't know the heights of).

• What if we used a different sample? 🤔

Concept Check ✅ – Answer at cc.dsc10.com

What strategy will help us assess how different our regression line's predictions would have been if we'd used a different sample?

• A. Hypothesis testing
• B. Permutation testing
• C. Bootstrapping
• D. Central Limit Theorem

Don't scroll pass this point without answering!

Prediction intervals

We want to come up with a range of reasonable values for a prediction for a single input $x$. To do so, we'll:

1. Bootstrap the sample.

2. Compute the slope and intercept of the regression line for that sample.

3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 many times to compute many slopes and many intercepts.

4. For a given $x$, use the bootstrapped slopes and intercepts to create bootstrapped predictions, and take the middle 95% of them.

The resulting interval is called a prediction interval.

Bootstrapping the scatter plot of mother/son heights

Note that each time we run this cell, the resulting line is slightly different!

# Step 1: Resample the dataset.
resample = mom_son.sample(mom_son.shape[0], replace=True)

# Step 2: Compute the slope and intercept of the regression line for that resample.
plot_regression_line(resample, 'mom', 'son', alpha=0.5)

plt.ylim([60, 80])
plt.xlim([57, 72]);

Bootstrapping predictions: mother/son heights

m_orig = slope(mom_son, 'mom', 'son')
b_orig = intercept(mom_son, 'mom', 'son')

m_boot = np.array([])
b_boot = np.array([])

for i in np.arange(5000):
    # Step 1: Resample the dataset.
    resample = mom_son.sample(mom_son.shape[0], replace=True)
    
    # Step 2: Compute the slope and intercept of the regression line for that resample.
    m = slope(resample, 'mom', 'son')
    b = intercept(resample, 'mom', 'son')
    m_boot = np.append(m_boot, m)
    b_boot = np.append(b_boot, b)

If a mother is 68 inches tall, how tall do we predict her son to be?

Using the original dataset, and hence the original slope and intercept, we get a single prediction for the input of 68.

pred_orig = m_orig * 68 + b_orig
pred_orig

70.68219686848825

Using the bootstrapped slopes and intercepts, we get an interval of predictions for the input of 68.

m_orig

0.3650611602425757

m_boot

array([0.33, 0.36, 0.42, ..., 0.33, 0.33, 0.4 ])

b_orig

45.8580379719931

b_boot

array([48.18, 46.26, 42.22, ..., 48.02, 48.13, 43.57])

boot_preds = m_boot * 68 + b_boot
boot_preds

array([70.74, 70.53, 70.98, ..., 70.6 , 70.88, 70.8 ])

l = np.percentile(boot_preds, 2.5)
r = np.percentile(boot_preds, 97.5)
[l, r]

[70.21553543791681, 71.15983764737595]

bpd.DataFrame().assign(
    predictions=boot_preds
).plot(kind='hist', density=True, bins=20, figsize=(10, 5), ec='w', title='Interval of predicted heights for the son of a 68 inch tall mother')
plt.plot([l,r],[0.01,0.01], c='gold', linewidth=10, zorder=1, label='95% prediction interval')
plt.legend();

How different could our prediction have been, for all inputs?

Here, we'll plot several of our bootstrapped lines. What do you notice?

draw_many_lines(m_boot, b_boot)      

Observations:

• All bootstrapped lines pass through $$(\text{mean mother's height in resample}, \text{mean son's height in resample})$$
• Predictions seem to vary more for very tall and very short mothers than they do for mothers with an average height.

Prediction interval width vs. mother's height

slider_widget()

HBox(children=(IntSlider(value=64, description="mom's height", max=78, min=50),))

Output()

Note that the closer a mother's height is to the mean mother's height, the narrower the prediction interval for her son's height is!

Summary, next time

Summary

• Residuals are the errors in the predictions made by the regression line.

$$\text{residual} = \text{actual } y - \text{predicted } y \text{ by regression line}$$

• Residual plots help us determine whether a line is a good fit to our data.
  • No pattern in residual plot = good linear fit.
  • Patterns in residual plot = poor linear fit.
  • The correlation coefficient, $r$, doesn't tell the full story! 🦖
• To see how our predictions might have been different if we'd had a different sample, bootstrap!
  • Resample the data points and make a prediction using the regression line for each resample.
  • Many resamples lead to many predictions. Take the middle 95% of them to get a 95% prediction interval.

Next time

• We're done with introducing new material!
• We'll review in class on Wednesday and Friday.